Wikipedia

  is the group editing allowed in wikipedia in a organized manner ?

While Wikipedia encourages collaboration among editors, organized editing by a specific group or organization is generally discouraged. This is because the goal of Wikipedia is to create a neutral and unbiased encyclopedia, and allowing organized groups to edit articles can lead to a lack of neutrality and potential conflicts of interest.

Wikipedia's guidelines and policies require editors to disclose any conflicts of interest they may have and to edit articles from a neutral point of view. If a group or organization is editing articles in a biased manner or attempting to push a specific agenda, this is typically viewed as a violation of these guidelines.

That being said, there are cases where organized groups have successfully collaborated with Wikipedia editors to improve articles in a constructive manner. For example, some museums or universities have collaborated with Wikipedia editors to improve articles related to their areas of expertise, while also ensuring that the articles are neutral and unbiased. However, any such collaborations must be done transparently and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

In some cases, these groups may be organized around specific ethnic, cultural, or political identities, and may seek to prevent others from making edits that they perceive as biased or inaccurate. This can lead to heated debates and conflicts over the content of certain articles, and can make it difficult for other editors to contribute to the discussion in a constructive way.

you can certainly discuss reasonable viewpoints, facts, and criticisms of an article's content on its talk page. In fact, this is one of the main ways that Wikipedia editors can collaborate and work together to improve the quality of articles.

The talk page is a space where editors can discuss issues related to an article's content, including disagreements over the accuracy or neutrality of certain information. It is important to note, however, that discussions on talk pages should be focused on improving the article and ensuring that it adheres to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

When discussing criticisms or viewpoints that differ from the current content of the article, it is important to provide reliable sources to support your arguments. This helps to ensure that any changes made to the article are based on verifiable information and are not the result of personal opinions or biases.

Overall, the talk page is an important tool for improving Wikipedia's content, and it provides a space for constructive discussions and debates about the accuracy and neutrality of articles. How to complain the conduct of Wikipedia admin ?

1. Try to resolve the issue informally: Before making a formal complaint, it's often helpful to try to resolve the issue informally. You can do this by contacting the administrator directly to discuss your concerns and see if you can come to a resolution.

2. Use the Wikipedia dispute resolution process: If you are unable to resolve the issue informally, you can use the Wikipedia dispute resolution process. This process involves a series of steps designed to help users resolve disputes and disagreements. You can find more information on the dispute resolution process here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution

3. Contact the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee: If you are unable to resolve the issue through the dispute resolution process, you can contact the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee. This committee is responsible for handling disputes that cannot be resolved through other means. You can find more information on how to contact the Arbitration Committee here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee

When making a complaint, it's important to provide specific examples and evidence to support your claims. You should also be respectful and civil in your communications, even if you disagree with the administrator's actions.